Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Razer Blade 16 (2025)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
57.7Inno Score
VS
Razer Blade 16 (2025)
54.1Inno Score
49.3Performance51.2
55Display52.2
86.7Battery61.9
42.5Portability52.5
0 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)4 spec wins — Razer Blade 16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 57.7 to 54.1, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+25) and display (+3). Razer Blade 16 (2025) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 62

Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 16 (2025)

  • Stronger portability score: 53 vs 43
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 20% lower thickness: 17.6 mm vs 22.1 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-SyncOLED
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%
Peak brightness—400 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 7940HXAMD Ryzen AI 9 365
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)LPDDR5X-8000
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,780Top 46%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,400Top 50%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Web browsing endurance—10 h
Charging280 W280 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Weight2.27 kg2.14 kg+6%
Thickness22.1 mm17.6 mm+20%
Material—CNC aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB4, 3x USB-A, HDMI 2.1, SD (UHS-II), 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p + IR
Biometrics—IR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup