ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 vs ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)
50Performance40.1
44.1Display33.1
73.3Battery60
39.8Portability89.7
6 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA6083 spec wins — ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 scores 51.8 against 51.7 for ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 edges ahead in battery and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
- Stronger performance score: 50 vs 40
- Stronger display score: 44 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 73 vs 60
- 269% higher charging: 240 W vs 65 W
- 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
Reasons to pick the ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)
- Stronger portability score: 90 vs 40
- 55% lower weight: 0.98 kg vs 2.2 kg
- 38% lower thickness: 15.9 mm vs 25.7 mm
- 25% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 480 nits
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+14% | 14 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB) | OLED (ASUS Lumina, non-touch) |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+175% | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 600 nits+25% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 260 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W) | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 |
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB) | LPDDR5X-8448 (soldered) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots) | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,673+26%Bottom 37% | 2,126Bottom 2% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 13,299+26%Top 50% | 10,550Bottom 13% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+29% | 70 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | 13 h | — |
| Charging | 240 W+269% | 65 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 0.98 kg+55% |
| Thickness | 25.7 mm | 15.9 mm+38% |
| Material | Plastic body with aluminum lid | Ceraluminum (ceramic-treated magnesium-aluminum alloy) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, one with G-SYNC and power delivery), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | FHD with IR | FHD (1080p) with IR |
| Biometrics | IR face (Windows Hello) | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 | ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs HUAWEI MateBook 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI (PHN16S-71)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs Alienware x16 R2VSASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14VSASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)vs HUAWEI MateBook 14 (2024)VSASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)vs ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)VSASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)vs HP OmniBook 5 14 (2025)VS