Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 vs MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM

ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808
50.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
50.9Inno Score
44.3Performancespec-basedchip43.4
85Graphicschip52.5
36.5Displayspec-based40
74.1Batteryspec-based66.7
26.4Portabilityspec-based60.3
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA8082 spec wins — MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 scores 50.8 against 50.9 for MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808

  • Stronger graphics score: 85 vs 53
  • 167% higher charging: 240 W vs 90 W
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 29% higher Screen size: 18 ″ vs 14 ″
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM

  • 35% lower weight: 1.7 kg vs 2.6 kg
  • 19% lower thickness: 21.6 mm vs 26.7 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
Screen size18 ″+29%14 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB)OLED
Resolution1920x12002880x1800
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness337 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 260AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W)AMD Radeon 860M
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)DDR5-5600 (SODIMM, 2 slots)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
Geekbench 6 (single)2,663Bottom 33%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,291Bottom 35%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)12,021Bottom 31%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
Capacity90 Wh+20%75 Wh
Web browsing endurance13.2 h—
Charging240 W+167%90 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
Weight2.6 kg1.7 kg+35%
Thickness26.7 mm21.6 mm+19%
MaterialPlastic—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
Ports1x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort with G-Sync, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 Gigabit LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DisplayPort, PD 3.0), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
WebcamFHD (1080p) with IR720p IR HD
BiometricsIR camera for Windows Hello face login—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 versus MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808MSI Venture A14 AI+ A3HM
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup