ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
44Performance25.3
37.4Display23.3
86.7Battery33.3
35.9Portability69.7
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6073 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
InnoReviews verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 34.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+53) and performance (+19). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
- Stronger performance score: 44 vs 25
- Stronger display score: 37 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 33
- 253% higher charging: 240 W vs 68 W
- 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
- Stronger portability score: 70 vs 36
- 40% lower thickness: 16.9 mm vs 28.2 mm
- 30% lower weight: 1.6 kg vs 2.27 kg
- 10% higher Peak brightness: 300 nits vs 273 nits
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level (G-Sync) | OLED (100% DCI-P3, 1,000,000:1 contrast) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+175% | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 273 nits | 300 nits+10% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7-13650HX | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-101 (8-core, up to 2.97GHz, 30MB cache) |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | Qualcomm Adreno GPU (integrated) |
| RAM | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM) | LPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable) |
| Storage | 512 GB+100% | 256 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) | M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD (single M.2 2280 slot, single-sided SSD only) |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+80% | 50 Wh |
| Charging | 240 W+253% | 68 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 1.6 kg+30% |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 16.9 mm+40% |
| Material | Aluminum lid, plastic base | Full-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testing |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | Thunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | 720p HD | FHD IR camera with Windows Hello support |
| Biometrics | None | Windows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs HP Spectre x360 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Dell XPS 13 (9345)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition (15", 9)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraVSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs Asus Vivobook 14VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs Lenovo Prima 14 IWCVSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs Dell 15 (DC15250)VS