Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
VS
ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
45.4Inno Score
44Performance44
37.4Display35.3
86.7Battery36.7
35.9Portability72.7
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6073 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 45.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+50) and display (+2). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 37
  • 400% higher charging: 240 W vs 48 W
  • 71% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 53 Wh
  • 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)

  • Stronger portability score: 73 vs 36
  • 40% lower thickness: 16.9 mm vs 28.2 mm
  • 34% lower weight: 1.5 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 10% higher Peak brightness: 300 nits vs 273 nits

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (100% sRGB)
Resolution1920x12001920x1200
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits300 nits+10%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core 7 Processor 350 (6-core, up to 4.8GHz, 17 TOPS NPU)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopIntel Graphics (integrated)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable)
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
Capacity90 Wh+71%53 Wh
Charging240 W+400%48 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
Weight2.27 kg1.5 kg+34%
Thickness28.2 mm16.9 mm+40%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseAll-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testing

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p FHD IR camera with Windows Hello support
BiometricsNoneWindows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup