Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs Razer Blade 16 (2025)

VS
WINNER
Razer Blade 16 (2025)
54.1Inno Score
44Performance51.2
37.4Display52.2
86.7Battery61.9
35.9Portability52.5
0 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6077 spec wins — Razer Blade 16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

Razer Blade 16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 54.1 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+17) and display (+15). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 62

Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 52 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 53 vs 36
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)OLED
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%
Peak brightness273 nits400 nits+47%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXAMD Ryzen AI 9 365
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-8000
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,780Top 46%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,400Top 50%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Web browsing endurance—10 h
Charging240 W280 W+17%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Weight2.27 kg2.14 kg+6%
Thickness28.2 mm17.6 mm+38%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseCNC aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x USB4, 3x USB-A, HDMI 2.1, SD (UHS-II), 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p + IR
BiometricsNoneIR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup