Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs MSI Raider 18 HX A2W

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
64.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
64.9Inno Score
63.5chipPerformancechip63.5
55Display80
86.7Battery86.7
50.3Portability20
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)3 spec wins — MSI Raider 18 HX A2W

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) scores 64.1 against 64.9 for MSI Raider 18 HX A2W. Pick by the categories that matter to you — MSI Raider 18 HX A2W edges ahead in display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 20
  • 44% lower thickness: 17.9 mm vs 32.1 mm
  • 39% lower weight: 2.2 kg vs 3.6 kg

Reasons to pick the MSI Raider 18 HX A2W

  • Stronger display score: 80 vs 55
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 43% higher charging: 400 W vs 280 W
  • 13% higher Screen size: 18 ″ vs 16 ″

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
Screen size16 ″18 ″+13%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-SyncIPS
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU (12GB GDDR7, 140W)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)DDR5-6400 (2 slots, up to 128GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots, one PCIe 5.0 compatible)

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Charging280 W400 W+43%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
Weight2.2 kg+39%3.6 kg
Thickness17.9 mm+44%32.1 mm
MaterialAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H tested—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
Ports1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 5 (DisplayPort, Power Delivery 3.1), 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1 (8K@60Hz / 4K@120Hz), SD Express card reader, 2.5G Ethernet (RJ45), 3.5mm combo jack, Kensington lock
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7 (Intel Killer BE1750)
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera1080p IR with HDR and privacy shutter
BiometricsIR camera with Windows Hello face recognition—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Raider 18 HX A2W
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup