Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs Razer Blade 18 (2025)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
63.8Inno Score
VS
Razer Blade 18 (2025)
62.2Inno Score
62.7Performance65.6
55Display55.5
86.7Battery98.7
50.3Portability20
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)4 spec wins — Razer Blade 18 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 62.2, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+30). Razer Blade 18 (2025) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 20
  • 36% lower thickness: 17.9 mm vs 27.9 mm
  • 29% lower weight: 2.2 kg vs 3.1 kg

Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 18 (2025)

  • Stronger battery score: 99 vs 87
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 43% higher charging: 400 W vs 280 W
  • 13% higher Screen size: 18 ″ vs 16 ″
  • 10% higher capacity: 99 Wh vs 90 Wh

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
Screen size16 ″18 ″+13%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-SyncIPS
Resolution2560x16003840x2400
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%
Peak brightness—500 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,127Top 15%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—20,220Top 11%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh99 Wh+10%
Charging280 W400 W+43%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
Weight2.2 kg+29%3.1 kg
Thickness17.9 mm+36%27.9 mm
MaterialAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H testedCNC aluminum (recycled)

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
Ports1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack1x Thunderbolt 5, 1x Thunderbolt 4, 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, 2.5G Ethernet, SD (UHS-II), 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera5MP + IR
BiometricsIR camera with Windows Hello face recognitionIR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus Razer Blade 18 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)Razer Blade 18 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup