Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) vs MSI Katana 17 HX B14W

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
38.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
38.4Inno Score
35.5chipPerformance47.7
23.3Display33
33.3Battery42.5
69.7Portability23
3 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)5 spec wins — MSI Katana 17 HX B14W

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) scores 38.1 against 38.4 for MSI Katana 17 HX B14W. Pick by the categories that matter to you — MSI Katana 17 HX B14W edges ahead in performance and display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)

  • Stronger portability score: 70 vs 23
  • 41% lower weight: 1.6 kg vs 2.7 kg
  • 39% lower thickness: 16.9 mm vs 27.8 mm
  • 30% higher Peak brightness: 300 nits vs 230 nits

Reasons to pick the MSI Katana 17 HX B14W

  • Stronger performance score: 48 vs 36
  • Stronger display score: 33 vs 23
  • Stronger battery score: 43 vs 33
  • 253% higher charging: 240 W vs 68 W
  • 140% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 60 Hz

Display

Display comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
Screen size16 ″17.3 ″+8%
Panel typeOLED (100% DCI-P3, 1,000,000:1 contrast)IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1080
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz+140%
Peak brightness300 nits+30%230 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100Intel Core i7-14650HX
GraphicsQualcomm Adreno GPU (integrated)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X (soldered)DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typeM.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDPCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,794Top 46%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,570Top 47%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
Capacity50 Wh75 Wh+50%
Web browsing endurance—6.4 h
Charging68 W240 W+253%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
Weight1.6 kg+41%2.7 kg
Thickness16.9 mm+39%27.8 mm
MaterialMetal (three-part body), MIL-STD-810H testedPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (10Gbps, display and power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A (5Gbps), 1x HDMI 2.1 TMDS, 3.5mm combo audio jack3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DisplayPort, PD 3.0), HDMI 2.1, RJ-45 Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35.3
WebcamFHD with IR720p HD
BiometricsIR camera for Windows Hello face loginNone

Software

Software comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)MSI Katana 17 HX B14W
Operating systemWindows 11 Home or ProWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup