Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) vs LG Gram 17 (2025)

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
45.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
LG Gram 17 (2025)
52Inno Score
44Performance41.5
35.3Display24.9
36.7Battery79.8
72.7Portability76
2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)6 spec wins — LG Gram 17 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

LG Gram 17 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 52 to 45.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+43) and portability (+3). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)

  • Stronger display score: 35 vs 25
  • 140% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 60 Hz

Reasons to pick the LG Gram 17 (2025)

  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 76 vs 73
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 47% higher capacity: 77 Wh vs 53 Wh
  • 35% higher charging: 65 W vs 48 W

Display

Display comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (100% sRGB)IPS
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate144 Hz+140%60 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits350 nits+17%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core 7 Processor 350 (6-core, up to 4.8GHz, 17 TOPS NPU)Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
GraphicsIntel Graphics (integrated)Intel Arc Graphics 140V
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable)LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typeM.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDPCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,640Bottom 39%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,700Bottom 7%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Capacity53 Wh77 Wh+47%
Web browsing endurance—16 h
Charging48 W65 W+35%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Weight1.5 kg1.35 kg+10%
Thickness16.9 mm+5%17.8 mm
MaterialAll-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testingMagnesium alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera with Windows Hello support1080p
BiometricsWindows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader)Fingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup