ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) vs Razer Blade 14 (2025)
44Performance51.1
35.3Display34
36.7Battery62.7
72.7Portability69.7
3 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)5 spec wins — Razer Blade 14 (2025)
InnoReviews verdict
Razer Blade 14 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 52.7 to 45.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+26) and performance (+7). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
- Stronger portability score: 73 vs 70
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 14% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 14 ″
Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 14 (2025)
- Stronger performance score: 51 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 63 vs 37
- 317% higher charging: 200 W vs 48 W
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- 37% higher capacity: 72 Wh vs 53 Wh
Display
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+14% | 14 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (100% sRGB) | OLED |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 2880x1800 |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits | 367 nits+22% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core 7 Processor 350 (6-core, up to 4.8GHz, 17 TOPS NPU) | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Graphics | Intel Graphics (integrated) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable) | LPDDR5X-8000 (soldered) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 1,024 GB+100% |
| Storage type | M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (1 slot) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,888Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 15,137Top 31% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 53 Wh | 72 Wh+37% |
| Charging | 48 W | 200 W+317% |
Design
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.5 kg+8% | 1.63 kg |
| Thickness | 16.9 mm | 16.2 mm+4% |
| Material | All-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testing | CNC aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB4, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, microSD (UHS-II), 3.5mm |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD IR camera with Windows Hello support | 1080p + IR |
| Biometrics | Windows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader) | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Related comparisons
ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)vs Dell 16 Plus (DB16250)VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14 (2024)VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)vs ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)vs MSI Katana 15 HX B14WVSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs COLORFIRE MEOW X16 Pro (2026)VSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)VSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs Microsoft Surface Laptop 15-inch (8th Edition)VSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs Framework Laptop 13 (Ryzen AI 300)VS