Skip to content
InnoReviews

Moto G96 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Moto G96 5G

Motorola

Moto G96 5G
42.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
21.8Performance64.4
56.9Display43.7
45.9Camera55.7
52.6Battery60.8
52Features60
5 spec wins — Moto G96 5G8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 42.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+43) and camera (+10). Moto G96 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Moto G96 5G

  • Stronger display score: 57 vs 44
  • 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
  • 47% higher Pixel density: 395 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 42% lower weight: 178 g vs 309 g
  • 39% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 12.9 mm

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 22
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 46
  • Stronger battery score: 61 vs 53
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 52
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Display

Display comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Screen size6.67 ″10 ″+50%
Panel typepOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution1080x24002160x1584
Pixel density395 ppi+47%269 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits1,600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Geekbench 6 (single)1,016Bottom 33%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,922Bottom 36%—
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB/256GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—

Camera

Camera comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto—10 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps—
Front camera32 MP+220%10 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Capacity5,500 mAh5,600 mAh+2%
Wired charging33 W45 W+36%
Wireless charging0 W15 W

Design

Design comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Weight178 g+42%309 g
Thickness7.9 mm+39%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP68IP48
Frame materialPlasticTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCNo—
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16 (One UI 8)
OS update pledge1 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Moto G96 5G versus Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
SpecMoto G96 5GSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup