OPPO Reno13 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
32.4Performance64.4
57.5Display43.7
61.4Camera55.7
68.6Battery60.8
100Features60
8 spec wins — OPPO Reno13 Pro5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: OPPO Reno13 Pro scores 57.2 against 57.4 for Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges ahead in performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno13 Pro
- Stronger display score: 58 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 69 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 32
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- 46% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.83 ″
- 33% higher Peak brightness: 1,600 nits vs 1,200 nits
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.83 ″ | 10 ″+46% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2800x1272 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi+67% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,600 nits+33% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.8 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,401Top 49% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,269Top 47% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x+17% | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,800 mAh+4% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+37% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm+41% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (ColorOS 15) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno13 Provs Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldVSOPPO Reno13 Provs HONOR Magic V3VSOPPO Reno13 Provs Huawei Mate X6VSOPPO Reno13 Provs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OSCAL PILOT 8VS