Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
23.1Performance80
60.2Display66.7
54.8Camera74
47.2Battery65.8
100Features94.7
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and camera (+19). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 15% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits
- 14% lower weight: 188 g vs 218 g
- 12% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.2 mm
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,300
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 66 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 498 ppi+21% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 92.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,787,981Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 11% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 3,030+173%Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 9,800+193%Top 8% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+14% | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVS