Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
77Performance80
85.3Display66.7
58.6Camera74
77.3Battery65.8
73.3Features94.7
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) scores 74.7 against 74.8 for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges ahead in features and camera, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 67
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 66
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 100% higher Wireless charging: 30 W vs 15 W
- 92% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 2,600 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 77
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 59
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $1,300 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+1% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 498 ppi+8% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 92.5 %+6% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 2,787,981Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 895,141Top 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 989,555Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 348,188Top 39% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 555,097Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 21% | 3,030+3%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 20% | 9,800+13%Top 14% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+27% | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+9% | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs POCO F8 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Redmi K90VSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs OPPO Find X10VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs POCO F8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs OPPO Find X10VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Vivo X200 ProVS