Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
23.1Performance64.4
60.2Display43.7
54.8Camera55.7
47.2Battery60.8
100Features60
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+41) and battery (+14). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+54% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,600 mAh+17% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+39% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+44% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS