Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr (2026) vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Motorola Razr (2026)
49.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
81.4Inno Score
23.1Performance87.6
60.2Display67.4
54.8Camera77
47.2Battery81
100Features100
2 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)7 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 81.4 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+65) and battery (+34). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)

  • 14% lower weight: 188 g vs 219 g
  • 13% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.3 mm

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 23
  • Stronger display score: 67 vs 60
  • Stronger camera score: 77 vs 55
  • Stronger battery score: 81 vs 47
  • 233% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 15 W

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Screen size6.9 ″6.9 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x26401200x2608
Pixel density413 ppi416 ppi+1%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,500 nits+17%
Screen-to-body—92.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7450XSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,600,724Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,032,276Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,345,109Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—495,988Top 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—727,351Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,108Bottom 43%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,343Bottom 47%—
Wild Life Extreme stability100 %Top 3%—
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options256GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.67
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—4.3 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity4,800 mAh6,000 mAh+25%
Wired charging30 W90 W+200%
Wireless charging15 W50 W+233%

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Weight188 g+14%219 g
Thickness7.3 mm+13%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup