Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
81.4Inno Score
86.9Performance87.6
74.3Display67.4
75.8Camera77
83.3Battery81
84Features100
4 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro5 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Vivo X300 Pro scores 81.2 against 81.4 for Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Xiaomi 17 Ultra edges ahead in features and camera, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 67
  • 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
  • 25% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 40 W
  • 16% higher Optical zoom: 4.3 x vs 3.7 x

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.9 ″+2%
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1260x28001200x2608
Pixel density452 ppi+9%416 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+29%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body91.6 %92.3 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared3,533,2223,600,724Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,032,276Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,345,109Top 11%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—495,988Top 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—727,351Top 11%
Geekbench 6 (single)3,473Top 11%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,264Top 12%—
Wild Life Extreme stability59 %Bottom 31%—
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.67
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto200 MP200 MP
Optical zoom3.7 x4.3 x+16%
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity6,510 mAh+9%6,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W90 W
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance12.8 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Weight226 g219 g+3%
Thickness8 mm+4%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup