Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
38.9Performance64.4
73.9Display43.7
54.7Camera55.7
57.2Battery60.8
73.3Features60
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 56.2 against 57.4 for Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges ahead in performance and battery, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 39
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 57
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher Optical zoom: 3 x vs 2 x
- 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+54% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3 x+50% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+40% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+39% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+45% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS