Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
25.4Performance64.4
60.2Display43.7
47Camera55.7
41.5Battery60.8
73.3Features60
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr 505 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 44.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+39) and battery (+19). Motorola Razr 50 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- 54% higher Pixel density: 413 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Lower launch price: $700 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 25
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 42
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+54% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054Bottom 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022Bottom 41% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+8% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,600 mAh+33% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+39% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+44% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50vs iPhone 14VSMotorola Razr 50vs OnePlus Nord CE4VSMotorola Razr 50vs realme C85 5GVSMotorola Razr 50vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS