Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
67.3Performance64.4
81.6Display43.7
58.6Camera55.7
75.5Battery60.8
73.3Features60
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+38) and battery (+15). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,300 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 43% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 7 ″
- 19% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″ | 10 ″+43% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+72% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+181% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987Top 14% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784Top 19% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,600 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+36% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+44% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS