Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
40.5Performance64.4
74Display43.7
54.8Camera55.7
50.4Battery60.8
100Features60
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr+ (2026) scores 58 against 57.4 for Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Motorola Razr+ (2026) edges ahead in features and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- Lower launch price: $1,100 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 41
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 50
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi+54% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,600 mAh+24% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+39% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+45% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS