Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs CMF Phone 1

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
CMF Phone 1

Nothing

CMF Phone 1

$199

40Inno Score
77Performance21.8
85.3Display51.5
58.6Camera30.7
77.3Battery67.2
73.3Features36
18 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — CMF Phone 1

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 40, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+55) and features (+37). CMF Phone 1 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 22
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 52
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 31
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 67
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 36

Reasons to pick the CMF Phone 1

  • Lower launch price: $199 vs $1,500

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
Screen size7 ″+5%6.67 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1224x29921080x2400
Pixel density462 ppi+17%395 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+150%2,000 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %+3%85.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Dimensity 7300
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956+188%Top 15%1,027Bottom 35%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651+193%Top 16%2,948Bottom 38%
Wild Life Extreme stability—100 %Top 3%
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB128GB/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+213%16 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired charging68 W+106%33 W
Wireless charging30 W0 W
Active use endurance16.5 h+2%16.2 h

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
Weight199 g197 g+1%
Thickness7.2 mm+12%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP48IP52
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesNo
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 14 (Nothing OS 2.6)
OS update pledge3 years+50%2 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus CMF Phone 1
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)CMF Phone 1
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup