Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs CMF Phone 2 Pro
77Performance21.8
85.3Display58.6
58.6Camera39.4
77.3Battery47.8
73.3Features49.3
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — CMF Phone 2 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 40.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+55) and battery (+30). CMF Phone 2 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 22
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 39
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 48
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
Reasons to pick the CMF Phone 2 Pro
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.77 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1084x2392 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+19% | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+67% | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro 5G |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+191%Top 15% | 1,016Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+192%Top 16% | 2,961Bottom 39% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.88 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 2 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+213% | 16 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+106% | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 185 g+7% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+8% | 7.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP54 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (Nothing OS 3.2) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSCMF Phone 2 Provs realme P3x 5GVSCMF Phone 2 Provs vivo Y39 5GVSCMF Phone 2 Provs Moto G MaxVSCMF Phone 2 Provs vivo T5 Lite 44W 5GVS