Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs OUKITEL C17 Mini

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
OUKITEL C17 Mini

Oukitel

OUKITEL C17 Mini

$108

21.5Inno Score
77Performance20
85.3Display26.9
58.6Camera20.5
77.3Battery20
73.3Features20
12 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — OUKITEL C17 Mini

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 21.5, pulling ahead mainly in display (+58) and battery (+57). OUKITEL C17 Mini still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 27
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 21
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 20
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 20

Reasons to pick the OUKITEL C17 Mini

  • 46% lower weight: 108 g vs 199 g
  • Lower launch price: $108 vs $1,500

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
Screen size7 ″+75%4 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDTFT
Resolution1224x2992540x1172
Pixel density462 ppi+41%327 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+175%60 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Screen-to-body87.3 %+4%83.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteUnisoc T610
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+300%4 GB
Storage options512GB32/64GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
Main camera50 MP+285%13 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/2.2
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps1080p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+900%5 MP
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
Capacity5,000 mAh+117%2,300 mAh
Wired charging68 W+580%10 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
Weight199 g108 g+46%
Thickness7.2 mm+44%12.9 mm
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69K
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesNo
USBUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 16
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus OUKITEL C17 Mini
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)OUKITEL C17 Mini
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup