Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Philips S7221 5G
77Performance28.9
85.3Display65.7
58.6Camera32.3
77.3Battery45.4
73.3Features46.7
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Philips S7221 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 42, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and battery (+32). Philips S7221 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 66
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 32
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 45
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 47
Reasons to pick the Philips S7221 5G
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 14% higher capacity: 5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+5% | 6.67 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 720x1600 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc T765 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB, 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+213% | 16 MP |
| OIS | Yes | — |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh+14% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+278% | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | — |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP64 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Philips S7221 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSPhilips S7221 5Gvs iPhone 13 miniVSPhilips S7221 5Gvs OPPO A5 Pro 5GVSPhilips S7221 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A53 5GVSPhilips S7221 5Gvs vivo T5x 5GVS