Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs POCO C75

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
POCO C75
33.3Inno Score
77Performance28.9
85.3Display38.8
58.6Camera30.1
77.3Battery40.3
73.3Features28
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — POCO C75

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 33.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and display (+47). POCO C75 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 39
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 40
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 28

Reasons to pick the POCO C75

  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
Screen size7 ″+2%6.88 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDIPS LCD
Resolution1224x2992720x1640
Pixel density462 ppi+78%260 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+733%600 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %+4%84 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps1080p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
Capacity5,000 mAh5,160 mAh+3%
Wired charging68 W+278%18 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
Weight199 g+2%204 g
Thickness7.2 mm+12%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP48—
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 14 (HyperOS)
OS update pledge3 years+50%2 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO C75
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO C75
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup