Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs POCO F7
77Performance61.1
85.3Display53.5
58.6Camera43.4
77.3Battery76.9
73.3Features70.7
12 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — POCO F7
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in display (+32) and performance (+16). POCO F7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 61
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 43
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 194% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 1,700 nits
Reasons to pick the POCO F7
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 30% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+2% | 6.83 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2772x1280 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+3% | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+194% | 1,700 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 2,205,378Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 618,105Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 777,545Top 33% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 365,752Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 443,976Top 42% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+44%Top 15% | 2,050Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+26%Top 16% | 6,850Top 25% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+150% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+8% | 216 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (HyperOS 2) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | POCO F7 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSPOCO F7vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FEVSPOCO F7vs HONOR 200 ProVSPOCO F7vs Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro MaxVSPOCO F7vs Huawei Pura 80VS

