Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Redmi 17C (China)

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
X
27.9Inno Score
77Performance20
85.3Display38.8
58.6Camera20.5
77.3Battery40.3
73.3Features20
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Redmi 17C (China)

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 27.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and features (+53). Redmi 17C (China) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 39
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 21
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 40
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 20

Reasons to pick the Redmi 17C (China)

  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
Screen size7 ″+2%6.88 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDIPS LCD
Resolution1224x2992720x1640
Pixel density462 ppi+78%260 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+733%600 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %+4%84 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB+300%4 GB
Storage options512GB64/128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
Main camera50 MP+285%13 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/2.2
Ultra-wide50 MP—
Max video8K@30fps1080p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+900%5 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
Capacity5,000 mAh5,160 mAh+3%
Wired charging68 W+278%18 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
Weight199 g+3%206 g
Thickness7.2 mm+12%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP48—
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesNo
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Redmi 17C (China)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Redmi 17C (China)
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup