Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Redmi K90 Pro Max
77Performance88.4
85.3Display67
58.6Camera69.5
77.3Battery92
73.3Features86.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Redmi K90 Pro Max
InnoReviews verdict
Redmi K90 Pro Max wins this phone face-off, 80.9 to 74.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+15) and features (+13). Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 67
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 11% higher Pixel density: 462 ppi vs 416 ppi
Reasons to pick the Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Stronger performance score: 88 vs 77
- Stronger camera score: 70 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
- 67% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 30 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+1% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2608x1200 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+11% | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+43% | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 91.8 %+5% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 3,734,624Top 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 1,069,368Top 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,381,879Top 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 487,580Top 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 795,797Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,560 mAh+51% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 100 W+47% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 50 W+67% |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+9% | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+9% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi K90 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSRedmi K90 Pro Maxvs Vivo X300 ProVSRedmi K90 Pro Maxvs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSRedmi K90 Pro Maxvs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSRedmi K90 Pro Maxvs Xiaomi 17T ProVS