Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Redmi Note 17
77Performance28.9
85.3Display52.3
58.6Camera30.7
77.3Battery71.3
73.3Features33.3
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Redmi Note 17
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 42.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and features (+40). Redmi Note 17 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 52
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 31
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 71
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 33
Reasons to pick the Redmi Note 17
- 54% higher capacity: 7,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″ | 6.99 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2396 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+23% | 376 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+178% | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 88.4 %+1% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+213% | 16 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,700 mAh+54% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+11% | 224 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+15% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP65 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Redmi Note 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSRedmi Note 17vs Blackview BL7000 ProVSRedmi Note 17vs HONOR X8cVSRedmi Note 17vs Redmi 17 5GVSRedmi Note 17vs vivo Y200 Pro 5GVS