Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
36.4Inno Score
77Performance27
85.3Display36.4
58.6Camera41.9
77.3Battery43.7
73.3Features38.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 36.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+50) and display (+49). Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)

  • 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
  • Lower launch price: $249 vs $1,500

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
Screen size7 ″+8%6.5 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1224x29922340x1080
Pixel density462 ppi+17%396 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+83%90 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+400%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteMediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu2,841,165+412%555,354
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956+305%Top 15%730Bottom 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651+330%Top 16%2,010Bottom 18%
RAM (max)16 GB+167%6 GB
Storage options512GB128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+900%5 MP
Max video8K@30fps1080p@30fps
Front camera50 MP+285%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired charging68 W+172%25 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
Weight199 g195 g+2%
Thickness7.2 mm+13%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP48—
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 13 (One UI 5.1)
OS update pledge3 years4 years+33%

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup