Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
77Performance43.2
85.3Display44.9
58.6Camera41.9
77.3Battery43.7
73.3Features65.3
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+40) and performance (+34). Samsung Galaxy A26 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 43
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 65
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $300 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+20% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+400% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 754,064Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 294,711Bottom 22% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,552Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 138,545Bottom 10% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 233,256Bottom 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+6% | 7.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs Huawei P40 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs Moto G85 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs POCO X6VSSamsung Galaxy A26 5Gvs Redmi Note 14 5GVS