Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
77Performance20
85.3Display36
58.6Camera33.1
77.3Battery38.8
73.3Features38.7
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and display (+49). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+9% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+12% | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+525% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+993% | 260,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+621%Top 15% | 410Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+555%Top 16% | 1,320Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+150% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+353% | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g+8% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+14% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVS