Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A35
77Performance31.4
85.3Display45.3
58.6Camera41.9
77.3Battery55.7
73.3Features70.7
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and display (+40). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 31
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 56
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+6% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+18% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+400% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 %+3% | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+182%Top 15% | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+193%Top 16% | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+38% | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+5% | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS