Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
77Performance34.7
85.3Display46.2
58.6Camera41.7
77.3Battery52.5
73.3Features89.3
12 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 47.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and display (+39). Samsung Galaxy A36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 35
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 53
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Stronger features score: 89 vs 73
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $400 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+20% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+317% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 816,934Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 304,148Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 133,245Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 150,052Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,489Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+191%Top 15% | 1,016Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+198%Top 16% | 2,902Bottom 35% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g+2% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+3% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVS