Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A50
77Performance20
85.3Display30.6
58.6Camera28.2
77.3Battery29.4
73.3Features33.3
17 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A50
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 27, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+57) and display (+55). Samsung Galaxy A50 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 31
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 28
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 33
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A50
- 17% lower weight: 166 g vs 199 g
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+9% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2340x1080 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+15% | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+175% | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+1253% | 210,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+769%Top 15% | 340Bottom 1% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+598%Top 16% | 1,240Bottom 1% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP+100% | 25 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+100% | 25 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+25% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+353% | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 166 g+17% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+6% | 7.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 9 (One UI) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A50vs vivo T5eVSSamsung Galaxy A50vs vivo Y03VSSamsung Galaxy A50vs realme Note 50VSSamsung Galaxy A50vs Redmi A3VS