Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A52
77Performance23.1
85.3Display35.6
58.6Camera48.4
77.3Battery39
73.3Features54.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A52
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+54) and display (+50). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 48
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 55
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+8% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+14% | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+525% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 720G |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+619% | 395,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+305%Top 15% | 730Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+355%Top 16% | 1,900Bottom 12% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+11% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+14% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme C75VSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Huawei P30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme 14x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Redmi 17C 5GVS