Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A55
77Performance37.9
85.3Display46.1
58.6Camera46.8
77.3Battery52.7
73.3Features78.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A55
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 48.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+39) and performance (+39). Samsung Galaxy A55 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 38
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 53
- 400% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A55
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $449 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+6% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+18% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+400% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 %+2% | 85.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 997,950Bottom 40% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 353,082Bottom 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 224,206Bottom 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 162,521Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 258,141Bottom 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+157%Top 15% | 1,150Bottom 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+154%Top 16% | 3,400Bottom 48% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+50% | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+7% | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs OPPO F33 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs Redmi Note 13 Pro (4G)VSSamsung Galaxy A55vs iQOO Z9x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+VS