Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A56
77Performance42.5
85.3Display48.5
58.6Camera42.6
77.3Battery58.2
73.3Features89.3
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A56
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+37) and performance (+35). Samsung Galaxy A56 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 43
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 49
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 43
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 58
- 317% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A56
- Stronger features score: 89 vs 73
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $499 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+20% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+317% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 87.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 1,227,862Bottom 42% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 466,860Bottom 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 292,734Bottom 44% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 171,100Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 297,168Bottom 41% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+119%Top 15% | 1,350Top 49% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+122%Top 16% | 3,900Top 48% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+50% | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g+1% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+3% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs POCO F6VSSamsung Galaxy A56vs REDMI Note 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs iPhone 14 ProVS