Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
77Performance28.9
85.3Display59.2
58.6Camera41.9
77.3Battery43.7
73.3Features65.3
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 44.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and battery (+34). Samsung Galaxy F36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 65
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+20% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 197 g+1% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+6% | 7.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs iQOO Z11xVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs Nothing Phone (4b)VSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs OPPO F29 5GVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy M36 5GVS