Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
77Performance21.8
85.3Display35.1
58.6Camera30.1
77.3Battery53.1
73.3Features46.7
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 34.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+55) and display (+50). Samsung Galaxy M15 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 22
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 35
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 53
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 47
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 20% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+8% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+17% | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+525% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+323%Top 15% | 699Bottom 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+364%Top 16% | 1,866Bottom 11% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+900% | 5 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+8% | 217 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+23% | 9.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M15 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy M15 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 30CVSSamsung Galaxy M15 5Gvs Lava Blaze X 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M15 5Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy M15 5Gvs realme C63VS