Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
77Performance29.1
85.3Display55.1
58.6Camera56.4
77.3Battery41.7
73.3Features73.3
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and battery (+36). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 42
- 468% higher AnTuTu: 2,841,165 vs 500,000
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,299 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+1% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 496 ppi+7% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+233% | 1,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+468% | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+228%Top 15% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+226%Top 16% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+11% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+4% | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+11% | 8.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS