Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
77Performance29.1
85.3Display54
58.6Camera65.9
77.3Battery55.1
73.3Features73.3
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and display (+31). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 54
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 55
- 468% higher AnTuTu: 2,841,165 vs 500,000
- 317% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 59
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 11% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 462 ppi
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+1% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 511 ppi+11% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+317% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+468% | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+228%Top 15% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+226%Top 16% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 4 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+25% | 40 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+10% | 222 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+18% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 10 (One UI 2) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VS