Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
77Performance39.3
85.3Display49.4
58.6Camera46.1
77.3Battery51.4
73.3Features78.7
17 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 49, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+38) and display (+36). Samsung Galaxy S23 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 39
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 49
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 46
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 51
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $600 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+9% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+15% | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+245% | 1,450 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 %+2% | 85.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+163% | 1,080,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+104%Top 15% | 1,450Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+128%Top 16% | 3,800Top 49% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+11% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+50% | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+5% | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 FEvs Nothing Phone (2a)VSSamsung Galaxy S23 FEvs OPPO F33 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S23 FEvs Infinix NOTE 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 FEvs POCO F5VS