Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S24
77Performance58
85.3Display60.7
58.6Camera47.3
77.3Battery48.4
73.3Features94.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S24
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 58.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+29) and display (+25). Samsung Galaxy S24 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 58
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 61
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 48
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S24
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 16% lower weight: 167 g vs 199 g
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+13% | 6.2 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+11% | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.5 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 1,897,064Top 44% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 628,799Top 39% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 583,932Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 271,803Bottom 49% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 412,530Bottom 51% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+34%Top 15% | 2,200Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+28%Top 16% | 6,750Top 26% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1/4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+25% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+50% | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 167 g+16% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+5% | 7.6 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24vs Huawei Pura 70VSSamsung Galaxy S24vs Xiaomi MIX FlipVSSamsung Galaxy S24vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S24vs Google Pixel 8 ProVS