Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
77Performance57
85.3Display52.9
58.6Camera46.1
77.3Battery52.6
73.3Features94.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 56.9, pulling ahead mainly in display (+32) and battery (+25). Samsung Galaxy S24 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 57
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 53
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 46
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 53
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $650 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+20% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+163% | 1,900 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 88 %+1% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 1,838,177Top 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 599,112Top 42% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 548,608Top 49% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 285,170Top 49% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 405,287Bottom 49% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+37%Top 15% | 2,150Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+31%Top 16% | 6,600Top 28% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+6% | 4,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+50% | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+7% | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+10% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs iPhone 14 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs OPPO Find X5 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs OPPO Reno14VSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs vivo V70 Lite 5GVS