Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S24+
77Performance61.1
85.3Display66.7
58.6Camera47.3
77.3Battery62.3
73.3Features94.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S24+
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 63, pulling ahead mainly in display (+19) and performance (+16). Samsung Galaxy S24+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 61
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 62
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 11% higher Pixel density: 513 ppi vs 462 ppi
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 513 ppi+11% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 91.6 %+5% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 1,914,857Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+31%Top 15% | 2,250Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+25%Top 16% | 6,900Top 24% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+2% | 4,900 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+38% | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g+2% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+6% | 7.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs REDMI Note 17 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Honor X80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Asus ROG Phone 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Huawei Mate 70 ProVS