Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S25
77Performance75.3
85.3Display61.3
58.6Camera47.3
77.3Battery51.4
73.3Features94.7
12 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 64.1, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+26) and display (+24). Samsung Galaxy S25 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 61
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 51
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 19% lower weight: 162 g vs 199 g
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+13% | 6.2 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+11% | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 91.1 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 2,578,555Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 792,959Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 925,248Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 331,698Top 33% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 528,650Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 2,950Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 9,400+9%Top 12% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128/256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+25% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+38% | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 162 g+19% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs Huawei Pura 90 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus 15RVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus 13sVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus Turbo 6X ProVS