Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
77Performance79.3
85.3Display63.6
58.6Camera47.3
77.3Battery54.2
73.3Features94.7
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25+
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 66.3, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+23) and display (+22). Samsung Galaxy S25+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 64
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 54
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 17% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,153 vs 8,651
- 11% higher Pixel density: 513 ppi vs 462 ppi
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 513 ppi+11% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+92% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 2,763,072Top 22% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 866,625Top 16% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 996,402Top 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,621Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 552,424Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 3,141+6%Top 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 10,153+17%Top 7% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+2% | 4,900 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+1% | 7.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs Infinix Note 60 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs OPPO Reno15 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs Huawei Pura X MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs iPhone 16 Pro MaxVS